There's something about the second one, it's just more "real" to my eyes.
Btw, I've said it before and I'll say it now: If you don't like it, it's "cliche", if you do like it, it's ~genre~. ;-) Both very good shots. Cheers, frank "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." -- Christopher Hitchens --- Original Message --- From: Walt Gilbert <[email protected]> Sent: April 25, 2012 4/25/12 To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> Subject: Tiny-GESO: Rainy Day Rose (comparison shots) Hi all, Cilche as hell, I know, but I just wanted to post these two shots for comparison purposes. http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/7114470527/ K100D, F 35-135/3.5-5.3, ISO 200, 1/250, f/6.3 http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/6968391742/ K20D, A 50/1.7, ISO 160, 1/800, f/2.8 I'd say the the K100D w/ F 35-135 combo holds its own, considering it was zoomed all the way out to its extreme end. -- Walt -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
