Thanks for the reminder, Frank! ;)
I think the second one was a little more color-faithful to the outer
petals. The first shot probably would have been closer, but I have the
saturation cranked down a bit on the K100D to help preserve detail. I
may have gone just a little too far.
-- Walt
On 4/25/2012 10:21 PM, [email protected] wrote:
There's something about the second one, it's just more "real" to my eyes.
Btw, I've said it before and I'll say it now: If you don't like it, it's
"cliche", if you do like it, it's ~genre~.
;-)
Both very good shots.
Cheers,
frank
"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Walt Gilbert<[email protected]>
Sent: April 25, 2012 4/25/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"<[email protected]>
Subject: Tiny-GESO: Rainy Day Rose (comparison shots)
Hi all,
Cilche as hell, I know, but I just wanted to post these two shots for
comparison purposes.
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/7114470527/
K100D, F 35-135/3.5-5.3, ISO 200, 1/250, f/6.3
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/6968391742/
K20D, A 50/1.7, ISO 160, 1/800, f/2.8
I'd say the the K100D w/ F 35-135 combo holds its own, considering it
was zoomed all the way out to its extreme end.
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
