So far, all D-FA lenses have an aperture ring, while it seems some DA lenses
cover 24x36 format (how well, I don't know).
So I have the feeling that now DA just means 'without an aperture ring' and
D-FA means 'with an aperture ring', irrespectively of the lens coverage.
Dario
-----Messaggio originale-----
From: P. J. Alling
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 6:03 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Some thoughts about a Sept announcement of a FF DSLR from Pentax
Not a lot of thoughts really. However if Pentax was really going to
announce a FF K mount camera wouldn't the latest lens, the DA 50 f1.8
which is pretty much one of their 50mm designs going back to oh, I don't
know the middle of the 20th century, and probably covers 24x36mm frames
admirably, be designated a DFA lens? True it doesn't have an aperture
ring, but it wouldn't be the first DFA lens to be released without one.
In the event of a FF camera probably wiith a list price between $2500
and $3500 it wouldn't cannibalize many sales of the FA 50 f1.4 lens with
that camera as the lens cost difference would be a fraction of the total
package price. So either a.) Pentax marketing has their collective
heads where the sun don't shine, or b.) there really isn't a FF camera
that close in the pipeline. I'll not take any bets either way, since
this is not necessarily an either or proposition.
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid
a lengthily search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
-----
Nessun virus nel messaggio.
Controllato da AVG - www.avg.com
Versione: 2012.0.1913 / Database dei virus: 2425/5038 - Data di rilascio:
01/06/2012
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
