Here is an estimate received this week:

$0.00 Down
$257/month
Fixed for 20 years – no increase
14,720 kWh/yr.
96% offset

OR

$33,504 initial cost
Electrical Savings: $2,700/yr.
State Incentive: $2,100/yr.
Net: $4,800/yr.
ROI: 14.3%

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:04 PM, George Sinos <[email protected]> wrote:
> Also, it should be understood that wind and solar are alternatives,
> not replacements for traditional power plants.  Solar and wind must be
> backed up by traditional generation, even if it is held in reserve.
> When the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't shine, people still
> want electricity.
>
> So, wind and solar can be used to defer the use of traditional
> resources, but eventually those traditional resources will be needed.
> As Paul says, currently wind and solar make up a very, very small
> percentage of current generation and it's likely to be that way for a
> long time.  There just isn't enough space to build all of the wind
> turbines and solar panels that would be necessary.
>
> I'm curious to hear a recent cost scenario for solar on a typical
> home.  Just a year or two ago installing enough panels to generate a
> significant amount of power had a 20 to 30 year payback.  Very few
> people are willing (or able) to make that kind of investment.
>
> I'm not against wind or solar, I just don't see the significant growth
> of their use happening soon.
>
> gs
>
> George Sinos
> --------------------
> [email protected]
> www.georgesphotos.net
> plus.georgesinos.com
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 13, 2012, at 3:50 PM, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Duh.... Me too
>>>
>>> Kenneth Waller
>>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: Peso: The White Towers
>>>
>>>
>>>> Ah, well, my comment in the previous post about those things being "scary" 
>>>> was because I thought it was a nuclear plant.
>>>>
>>>> Not that coal is ideal but if one believes the current propaganda it can 
>>>> actually be quite clean these days. I think I'd prefer fossil fuel to 
>>>> nuclear.
>>>>
>>
>> Coal is by far the dirtiest fuel that can be burned to produce energy, even 
>> with high-tech scrubbing devices. They can't scrub away the greenhouse 
>> gases. Natural gas is much better, for example, but the ill-founded fracking 
>> paranoia has limited development of that resource. As public hysteria leads 
>> to the shuttering of more nuclear plants, the power-producing infrastructure 
>> will get dirtier. Much dirtier.  Some super-clean super-safe hydro plants 
>> are being shut down as well in order to save fish. The current population of 
>> active and planned windmills and solar installations has minimal effect on 
>> the overall picture.  Clean power is a LONG way off.
>>
>> Paul
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> frank
>>>>
>>>> "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." --  
>>>> Christopher Hitchens
>>>>
>>>> --- Original Message ---
>>>>
>>>> From: Steven Desjardins <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: August 11, 2012 8/11/12
>>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: Peso: The White Towers
>>>>
>>>> Nope.  Fall River, Mass.  That's a coal-fired power plant.  The hot
>>>> water they were releasing into the river was harming the fish, so they
>>>> built cooling towers like  aNuclear plant.  It's essentially a
>>>> self-contained system.  As funny as it is, those towers make the plant
>>>> a bit more green.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Walter Hamler <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Is that Three Mile Is, PA ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Walt
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Steven Desjardins <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> I went to my hometown last week to visit my family.  I hadn't been
>>>>>> home in about 4 years, and I while walking through the park I got a
>>>>>> good view of some new construction:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://drd1135.smugmug.com/Photography/pdml/i-bmxVGWm/0/XL/towers-XL.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm about 3 miles away.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Steve Desjardins
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Steve Desjardins
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to