Given the following: On Aug 17, 2012, at 14:37 , John Sessoms wrote:
> Given: > > L W M as seen by... > 1 2 3 MFb > 4 5 6 WFb > 7 8 9 LFb > > I see OS choices as 4,2,9 > > GUI development reached its pinnacle with OS/2 v.3.0 Every change since then > has been a step further down a slippery slope into hell. > > I don't really care how the computer gets the job done underneath where I > can't see it, but leave the damn buttons alone so I know where to find them. > I liked WindozeXP mainly because it's the closest Micro$oft has come so far > towards achieving a GUI I'm comfortable with, i.e. I know where the damn > buttons are. > > I don't like having to continually play "button, button, who's got the > button" every time I want to get something done. > > Usability of GUI design can be graphed as y=x^2+1 where a PERFECT INTERFACE > is defined as [0,0] > > Substitute the following values of 'x' for certain interfaces: > > "-10" for Windoze 3.1, OS/2 v.2.1 > "- 2" for Windoze 95, 98, 98SE, 2K, NT4.0 > "0" for WindozeXP, OS/2 v.3.0 > "22/7" for Windoze Vista > > "square root of -1" for MacOS > "101010" for Linux > > I haven't made up my mind about Windoze7 yet, but I shouldn't have to reboot > the damn thing 15 times just to get a week's worth of security patches > installed. I think your brain is destined for Windows. A Mac user would not nor should not be forced to understand what the hell you are talking about. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
