Hi Mick ... For what I'm doing now I see no reason to get into something like Dreamweaver. For a few lists and tables, and for posting photographs, what more is needed? What do you mean by "design centric" anyway? Plus, I enjoy hand coding, and learning a little in that way.
No, I don't see simple CSS as a problem for many people, especially the simple stuff that I'm using now. If a browser won't support some of what I'm doing, it should still display the text and images without the decorations and "fancy" things. I want my sister, with her hand-cranked computer and kerosene powered screen to be able to visit my site and navigate through it quickly and easily. Do these "design centric" sites take more time to load? Use more resources? Work on old computers with older operating systems and browsers? Mick Maguire wrote: > > Hi Shel, perhaps you ought to invest in a copy of something like Macromedia > Dreamweaver. Firstly it makes web page design so much easier and a lot more > design rather than HTML centric, but also it will tell you what works and > what doesn't in your pages with various browsers. I'm a software engineer by > trade, and part of said engineering will require producing web content. I > have used Dreamweaver for the past year and find it pretty good (as this > sort of software goes). > > for what it's worth I think that you'd be pretty hard pressed to shut > anybody out of pages by use of things like css etc. OK they may not see the > page exactly as you intended, but all they are likely to lose is style > information, they should be able to see the text content whatever you do. -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/darkroom-rentals/index.html - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
