El 20/11/2012 6:52, Igor Roshchin escribió:
Hi All: About 2 months ago, there was a thread about FA35/2. Interestingly, that while people have mentioned DA35/2.4, and a few other 35s, nobody mentioned DA 35/2.8 macro. How is DA 35/2.8 macro in comparison to either FA35/2 or DA35/2.4 (or even 16-50/2.8)?
I had both the FA 35mm 2.0 and the Limited macro. To summarize my experience with those lenses, I'd say that they are both excellent, but if I had to choose one of them, I'd stay with the FA35/2 because I found it better suited for general photography and also because I prefer its rendering capabilities. It also focuses faster and being faster it is a better lens in low light environments. The Lim. is better built and has quick shift, but I think the FA35 is better for non-macro photographers.
The DA35 is said to be a kind of low cost FA35 with no QS and plastic bayonet, having the same optical design of the FA but half a stop slower.
Carlos -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
