On 19/11/2012 11:52 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hi All:
About 2 months ago, there was a thread about FA35/2.
Interestingly, that while people have mentioned DA35/2.4, and a few
other 35s, nobody mentioned DA 35/2.8 macro.
How is DA 35/2.8 macro in comparison to either FA35/2 or DA35/2.4
(or even 16-50/2.8)?
My completely non scientific thoughts.
I can't say anything bad about the FA35/2. It's a competent lens hidden
behind an el cheapo, plastic fantastic facade.
The 35/2.8LTD is a glorious little lens. It may well be the best all
round lens ever made. It isn't the fastest thing around, but it is a
really, really nice little lens. As far as standard lenses go, for me it
is a too up between the 31 and the 35/2.8. I like the speed of the 31,
and anyone who talks about it's legendary imaging qualities is most
certainly downplaying it's qualities, but anyone talking about the 35LTD
is doing the same thing.
It really is a wonderful little lens, and well worth the price.
Thank you in advance,
yer welcome
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
