Hello Igor,
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:52:50 -0500 (EST) Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
>About 2 months ago, there was a thread about FA35/2.
>Interestingly, that while people have mentioned DA35/2.4, and a few
>other 35s, nobody mentioned DA 35/2.8 macro.
I am not sure how spread it is amongs the PDML crowd :-)
I did not have an AF 35 mm (but do have the limited 31mm), and since I like
to do a lot of macro work, I did get one right after it came out.
Like all Pentax macro's it is quite sharp.
It also has a good bokeh, important for macro backgrounds.
For an example seen my PUG submission for november:
http://pug.komkon.org/12nov/slides/JVW-K5_20923.jpg
>How is DA 35/2.8 macro in comparison to either FA35/2 or DA35/2.4
>(or even 16-50/2.8)?
Never did a pixel-peep compare on that, but in use it is quite nice, not too
big,
and really versatile due to its (handheld) macro capability, and relatively
fast with f/2.8.
The AF is not that fast, and it can hunt a bit due to the long range it can
handle.
Together with the 18-135 WA zoom, this is probably the most used lens on my K5.
It is also a good one to use on the Q, with a K-to-Q converter, equivalent to a
180mm or so,
and going all the way to 1:1 (which is something like 4x6 mm on the Q)
Regards, JvW
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
