Christine,

I haven't tried much since the last weekend, about which I wrote
here, on the list, earlier:

http://pdml.net/pipermail/pdml_pdml.net/2012-December/332613.html

> [*] About misses I had.
> 1. Focusing in 11-segment AF mode was sometimes choosing the wrong
> object. Switching to the center-point AF helped.
> 2. Some shots had focus that is good but not perfect.
> I am not sure if this was the effect of motion of the subjects,
> motion blur from hand-holding the camera, or the AF error. I don't jump
> in claiming the latter. 

In my, yet limited, experience, the AF is better than that of K-7.
But I might be imagining that due to the desire to have that
improvement.
(People say that K-7 and K-5 AF was similar.)

Igor


Sun Dec 9 16:37:47 EST 2012
Christine Aguila wrote:

Looks very nice, Igor. I agree with you this is nice noise quality.  How
is the autofocusing in low light?  Cheers, Christine 



On Dec 9, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Igor Roshchin <str at komkon.org> wrote:

> 
> (Rick Womer, please stop reading now, or you might start hating me.)
> 
> I am continuing looking through the photos taken at the tango festival 
> last weekend with the brand new K5 IIs.
> 
> Here are some 9 photos that were taken at ISO-6400:
> http://42graphy.org/misc/ISO-6400-tango/
> Most of them are not perfect: a few are slightly out of focus and/or  
> are suffering from the camera shake (the camera was hand-held
> for all these photos).
> I was still playing with the settings (various AF modes) and modes
> (S/TA/T priority).
> But, I think these photos show the quality of the ISO-6400.
> (Some NR, in the range 35-70 for luminance, was applied in LR, except 
> for the 2nd shot, _IR00019, where no NR was done. For that shot, NO
> image manipulation, except cropping and resizing was done, - hence
> some
> noise can be seen).
> 
> And some of these photos are fun by themselves (IMHO).
> Comments are (as always) welcome, including constructive critique and
> recommendations.
> 
> Igor

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to