Rick, heh! Humans are weak, aren't they? You've got some interesting photos there. (Is that your daughter?)
The technical nuance is that the gallery I put out consists of shots taken at ISO-6400. They aren't the best shots from the evening, but I appreciate the quality that I wouldn't have been able to obtain with my K-7 without the flash. Not having had any personal experience with K-5, I am not in position to compare K-5 vs K-5 IIs. (That gives me a hope that I won't gain an extra hater this week.) Cheers, Igor Mon Dec 10 21:03:32 EST 2012 Rick Womer wrote: > I am weak, and I looked at them anyway! > > Very nice set, but I don't hate you yet, because you haven't shown me > how my K-5 might be inferior to the IIs. > > Heck, I shot this set of dance pix with a K10D: > > http://photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=946280 > > FWIW, I think the AF on the K-5 is considerably better (especially with > moving subjects) than on the K-7 (I have both). > > Cheers, > > Rick -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
