Thanks, Igor. Cheers, Christine
On Dec 9, 2012, at 5:11 PM, Igor Roshchin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Christine, > > I haven't tried much since the last weekend, about which I wrote > here, on the list, earlier: > > http://pdml.net/pipermail/pdml_pdml.net/2012-December/332613.html > >> [*] About misses I had. >> 1. Focusing in 11-segment AF mode was sometimes choosing the wrong >> object. Switching to the center-point AF helped. >> 2. Some shots had focus that is good but not perfect. >> I am not sure if this was the effect of motion of the subjects, >> motion blur from hand-holding the camera, or the AF error. I don't jump >> in claiming the latter. > > In my, yet limited, experience, the AF is better than that of K-7. > But I might be imagining that due to the desire to have that > improvement. > (People say that K-7 and K-5 AF was similar.) > > Igor > > > Sun Dec 9 16:37:47 EST 2012 > Christine Aguila wrote: > > Looks very nice, Igor. I agree with you this is nice noise quality. How > is the autofocusing in low light? Cheers, Christine > > > > On Dec 9, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Igor Roshchin <str at komkon.org> wrote: > >> >> (Rick Womer, please stop reading now, or you might start hating me.) >> >> I am continuing looking through the photos taken at the tango festival >> last weekend with the brand new K5 IIs. >> >> Here are some 9 photos that were taken at ISO-6400: >> http://42graphy.org/misc/ISO-6400-tango/ >> Most of them are not perfect: a few are slightly out of focus and/or >> are suffering from the camera shake (the camera was hand-held >> for all these photos). >> I was still playing with the settings (various AF modes) and modes >> (S/TA/T priority). >> But, I think these photos show the quality of the ISO-6400. >> (Some NR, in the range 35-70 for luminance, was applied in LR, except >> for the 2nd shot, _IR00019, where no NR was done. For that shot, NO >> image manipulation, except cropping and resizing was done, - hence >> some >> noise can be seen). >> >> And some of these photos are fun by themselves (IMHO). >> Comments are (as always) welcome, including constructive critique and >> recommendations. >> >> Igor > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
