I gotta go along with your perspective here and I'm pleased to have it. . I
haven't paid much attention to the digital world. Although I scan most of m
color images and print them digitally. That's as far as I'm going for now.
Interestingly enough, many of the photographers who shoot cars for our
company use digital setups on 45 bodies that generate files of around 60
megabytes. I generate 250 megabyte files from my 6x7 scans. On a 13 x19
print, the difference shows. The studio guys acknowledge that film is still
better, but they also kow that the clients like the immediate turnaround of
digital. (If they so choose the agency and client folk can watch the scan
take shape on a monitor in the studio.
That's where it's at for commrece, but not for art.
Paul
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Yes, the Optio 330 is a 3mp camera, but it doesn't offer the features
> that I want. For example, one feature that's important is the ability
> for the camera to take an accessory wide angle lens. The Optio doesn't
> allow that, so I'm stuck with 37mm at the wide end. There's no TIFF
> format, and close focusing, or macro mode, doesn't come as close as some
> other cameras.
>
> Yes, it's a pretty good camera in some respects, but that's essentially
> all Pentax offers - the Optio in three flavors, vanilla, chocolate, and
> strawberry.
>
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
> >
> > Isn't the Optios a 3+ megapixel camera?
> > Looks pretty nice from what I've seen.
>
> --
> Shel Belinkoff
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
