Hi, Pal, Thanks for clarifying. I'm not so self-absorbed to think that you were referring to me in particular - or at all! <vbg>
And, to clarify my earlier post, I certainly am not one of those who thinks that Pentax puts out junk, and that only their earlier stuff is somehow "worthy". It's just that their older gear suits my needs. At our Toronto meeting a month or so ago, I got to look at and hold Pat's MZ S and Brendan's MZ 3, and they're beautiful pieces of equipment. If I had the money - well, actually, if I had the money, I'd buy a 67, or a bunch of lenses for my MX or Spotmatics. ;-) Beyond the fact that I may well make a new purchase some day, I do have a vested interest in Pentax putting out high-quality new stuff: it keeps the used market flooded with Pentax stuff, being sold to finance other's new purchases. cheers, frank P�l Jensen wrote: > I wasn't refering to you in particular. It's fine that some are happy with older >equipment. It's just that some of those users seem not to want Pentax to put out >anything desirable anymore. > > P�l > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . -- "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
