I have had the 16-45 for a number of years, 6 maybe, i bought it when i had the istd. I found it a bit soft on the D but worked very nicely on my KL-10D and now my K-5. Gives pleasing results imo. its the lens that just stays on my K-5.
Dave On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Collin Brendemuehl <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyone here use the 16-45? > How would you evaluate the results you get? > I'm looking for a carry-around for people shooting (dance studio). > And this is half the price of the 16-15/2.8. > Hopefully it produces a high quality image. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
