On 13 March 2013 22:04, Collin Brendemuehl <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyone here use the 16-45? > How would you evaluate the results you get? > I'm looking for a carry-around for people shooting (dance studio). > And this is half the price of the 16-15/2.8. > Hopefully it produces a high quality image.
I had one for a number of years and used it as a carry around lens but mainly for landscape/travel, it exhibits a bit of CA which can be dealt with in post , it's pretty sharp, distortion is reasonable and AF is not too slow though MF can be tricky due to the very short focus throw. I recently changed over to a Sigma 17-50/2.8 though, mainly so that I had a bit more speed for people oriented shots, it was more expensive but I can't complain, it delivers. Cheers, -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
