On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:27:39PM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> Like the bird and detail, but appears to be a  tad overexposed.

Yeah, processing those shots was a pain.  Noonday sun, the shadows 
were very dark.  It's a testament to the K-5 that they only look
a "tad overexposed", rather than half of it being either blown out
 or pitch black.  I'll see what I can do when I get home tonight. 

> 
> Marnie aka Doe :-)
> 
> In a message dated 5/14/2013  1:21:09 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
> [email protected] writes:
> > Sometimes,  one can get a surprisingly good clear photo of a wild bird 
> with 
> > a 35mm  lens.
> >
> >  http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/8737901916/
> >
> > I did change  to the 18-250 about halfway through the set, if folks are 
> >  interested:
> >  http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157633476487025/
> >
> >  -- 
> > Larry Colen [email protected]  http://red4est.com/lrc  
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
Larry Colen [email protected]  http://red4est.com/lrc


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to