"Mike Ignatiev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >sure, in a perfect world. > >in reality NONE of browsers handles w3c standards 100%, and every one has >it's own non-standard extensions.
The best way to make things work in both major browsers is to avoid non-standard extensions of *both* major browsers. Go with HTML 4.0 standard, in other words, like William suggested. >msie is a "de-facto" standard, which >doesn't make it more compliant than, say, opera or konqueror I personally avoid even official HTML 4.0 if it isn't supported by *both* the major browsers: Netscape 4.x didn't support inline frames, even though they were part of the HTML standard when those browsers were introduced, so I don't use inline frames. (Does Netscape 6.x support them? No matter, there are still too many 4.x users out there.) >> All a webpage writer can do is ensure that his code is HTML >> compliant. If it is, and your browser has a problem with it, >> then it is your problem, not the author of the webpage. >> There are standards in place for a reason. >> William Robb Yep. If you do it right, it'll look *different* in different browsers, but it'll work OK. -- Mark Roberts www.robertstech.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
