So its a status lens?
I mean a Rolex still tells time like a Casio or Timex, so its mainly a
status thing, but can the 1.8 be that much better than a 2.8?
Reminds me of when I was searching for stereo components many moons ago for
$XXXX I could get a very good sounding system but for many times that amount
I could get a highly recommended system that I honestly couldn't hear the
difference in sound quality.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darren Addy" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: KEH has an A* 135mm f1.8
Similar discussion for Rolex vs Timex. Mostly similar reasons for
owning both the Rolex and the A* 135mm f1.8.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
On 22/07/2013 12:38 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Can it really be worth $2569 ?
Save yourself $2400.00 and go for the f/2.8.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
