Meanwhile back at the homestead, granny, was busy beating off the Indians...
On 7/22/2013 10:23 PM, John wrote:
"Beat off" doesn't have quite the same meaning in the U.S.
On 7/22/2013 4:25 PM, Bob W wrote:
The difference between a Rolex and a Timex is that you can beat off
potential muggers with a Rolex and you won't damage the watch,
whereas with a Timex no-one wants to mug you.
B
On 22 Jul 2013, at 21:02, <[email protected]> wrote:
So its a status lens?
I mean a Rolex still tells time like a Casio or Timex, so its
mainly a status thing, but can the 1.8 be that much better than a
2.8?
Reminds me of when I was searching for stereo components many moons
ago for $XXXX I could get a very good sounding system but for many
times that amount I could get a highly recommended system that I
honestly couldn't hear the difference in sound quality.
Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message ----- From: "Darren Addy"
<[email protected]> Subject: Re: KEH has an A* 135mm f1.8
Similar discussion for Rolex vs Timex. Mostly similar reasons
for owning both the Rolex and the A* 135mm f1.8.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Bill
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 22/07/2013 12:38 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Can it really be worth $2569 ?
Save yourself $2400.00 and go for the f/2.8.
bill
--
There are two kinds of computer users those who've experienced a hard drive
failure, and those that will.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
