Then we must look to you to answer your own question. (I'm interested
in the answer).
Darren, I'd sell it when they unwrap my cold dead fingers from around it !
It one of the lenses I'll never sell as long as I'm on this side of the
grass & I'm still shooting Pentax.
It was actually recommended to me by a Nikon pro when I was taking a
workshop from him and he saw I was shooting Pentax. When I did get it and
went to another of his workshop he had to borrow and examine it as he had
heard it was equal to or better than the Nikon 200 macro he was using. Quite
a recommendation I'd say.
In my estimation I'd have to say its worth as much or more than the A* 135
because of its unique function - macro with working distance.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darren Addy" <[email protected]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: KEH has an A* 135mm f1.8
Kenneth Waller <[email protected]>
but can the 1.8 be that much better than a 2.8?
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Kenneth Waller <[email protected]>
wrote:
Ah, but I can ask because I have one, bought around 15 years ago for
$800usd.
Then we must look to you to answer your own question. (I'm interested
in the answer).
: )
--
"Photography is a Bastard left by Science on the Doorstep of Art" -
Peter Galassi
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
