That's true, but when the K-5 was introduced the K-x was beneath it, and that K-x was replaced by the K-r, and then that was "replaced" by the K-30. Two points defines a line in geometry, but (I agree) it "ain't much" of a line.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:44 PM, John <[email protected]> wrote: > My take on it is the K5 can't be Pentax's top-of-the-line model unless > there's actually a "line" for it to be on top of. The K-50 & K-500 serve > that purpose. > > Yes, I *AM* a cynical old man. > > > On 8/27/2013 1:29 PM, John wrote: >> >> Oh my, I am now really confused. There are k-5, k-50, and k-500 >> models. Plus there is now a K-5 II. The II is probably what is causing >> the price drops I have seen on the K-5. All appear to be an upgrade >> from my DS. What experience have people had with these cameras. Are >> any or all upgrades from my DS? (Of course they are, but at what cost?) >> What features am I giving up that I would miss beyond comprehension if I >> purchased a particular camera model. Meanwhile, my beloved DS keeps >> grinding out pictures even though they are not full frame and ????? >> pixel pictures. >> >> Seriously, are there any reviews of these models that you really >> trust.....or distrust? >> >> Thank you, everyone, for your thoughts and advice. And I thought >> purchasing the DS was a hard decision. I do have a couple of film >> cameras if anyone is interested. Respooling B&W film is not all that bad! >> >> John G. >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
