On Sep 17, 2013, at 5:34 AM, Larry Colen wrote:

> Prices on the K-5 II are plummeting. I think that we are getting pretty 
> close to the next big announcment.  I'm going to take some guesses.
> 
> 1) When you look at cameras that Ricoh and Pentax have produced lately:
> GXR, Q, K-01, and even the K-5,50,500  you have a collection of 
> cameras where the company is not afraid to take a chance on something
> different.  I would be very surprised if the next camera is a "me too"
> DSLR. 
> 
> 2) Each of the recent Pentax bodies has interesting mirrorless features.
> DSLR, or mirrorless, it will have a strong mirrorless mode, with focus
> peaking.
> 
> 3) Mirror or mirroless, it will keep the K-mount.  They just updated the
> DA limiteds.  They *could* be for just the current line up, but a radical
> departure in camera mount seems out of character.  If you look at the
> percentage of Pentax sales to return customers (the only ones who know
> who Pentax is), a radical change in lens mount would be shooting themselves
> in the foot, because that would negate the biggest reason for many 
> of their customers to not change to Nikon or Canon.  
> 
> Remember that wide angle lens that they showed, but didn't talk about 
> at the show where they released the K-01?  The one where the rear element
> extended into the mirrorbox?  Either the camera will be a high end, K-mount
> mirrorless, or it will have a mode where you can lock the mirror up, and 
> use lenses that extend into the mirrorbox.  If I could lock the mirror
> up on my 1968 SRT-101, they should be able to do the same on a modern 
> DSLR. 
> 
> 4) I'd say it's an 80% chance that it will be APS, not 24x36 sensor.  
> Note that they released new versions of DA limiteds, not FA limiteds. 
> I'll guess that the sensor will be 24-30 MP, and the per-pixel performance
> will be at least a stop better than the K-5 (at 1.5 - 2 times the resolution).
> 
> I suspect that there will be non-retrofocus wide angle lenses, and the system
> will have overall performance that will rival the D800 and 5DmkIII, at a 
> significantly lower price. 
> 
> I think that the flagship, if APS will list for $2,000. If 24x36 will list
> for $2,400. 

I don't see anything in your speculative description that is anything but a 
minor tech tweek/upgrade. There is no way I can see a new APS-C body priced at 
$800 more than the K-5iis unless they actually either made substantive real 
massive improvements in AF speed and accuracy and frame rate and buffer 
capacity, or they give us more color choices. ;-) A sensor with higher pixel 
count would be a negative  for me unless and until I am convinced that they 
haven't sacrificed high-ISO image quality. Anything without an optical 
viewfinder would be a huge negative and would put the camera in the $300-350 
range for me.
> 
> 5) It will be weather sealed, with in body shake reduction.
> 
> 6) I think that if it has a mirror, they will add focus points, but not
> enough of them.
> 
> 7) I think that they will drop the K-5, but keep the K50 and 500.
> If they do keep the K-5II, the list price would need to drop to
> at, or below the cost of the K-50. 
> 
> 8) I'd say 80% chance that it will not have an anti-aliasing filter
> over the sensor. 
> 
> 9) There will be much gnashing of teeth, rending of shirts and pulling
> of hair because it will not be just a 24x36 version of the K-5 with 40
> autofocus points.  A lot of those people will at that point sell off
> their pentax gear and buy a full frame canikon.  Very few of them 
> will get photos that are technically superior to what they would have 
> gotten if they had stayed with Pentax.  
> 
> Why not full frame?  Look at the new u4/3 cameras. Their sensors are
> half the area of APS, and the sensor performance of the top end 
> u 4/3 cameras are getting close to that of the K-5.
> 
> I think that the camera will likely be announced close to the beginning
> of November (unless there is a big camera show before then), just in
> time for the holiday wishlists.
> 
> -- 
> Larry Colen                  [email protected]         http://red4est.com/lrc
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to