I want to minimize the wasted film in the header and (int he case of
bulk loading) the tail - since that is a constant the more film in the
canister means a greater ratio fo used film to wasted film... BUT - I
have had a couple of longer rolls and spooling them onto standard
plastice spools can be a problem is they get too long. SO, I am sticking
with 36 exposure per roll for now. It still takes me a long time to shot
out that much film...
Mark
On 10/6/2013 1:21 AM, Jens wrote:
It may be annoying not knowing how many frames are in the canister. I seem to
choose either 20 or 36, so I', never in doubt...
You can however fill in 40 frames easily, if you want to. But then Again
There's perhaps a problem of storing the developed frames. Perhaps you might
want to fill each paper sheet with negatives from the same roll. IIRC a sheet
will contain 42 frames. This might be a nice number of frames for one roll:-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
