might be nice to use, but it sure isn't "pretty" … looks like a modern retro Camaro: it has some of the line, but it's all bloated and festooned with gee-gaws. To my eye, the chrome is particularly ugly looking. or rather, "industrial faux".
but if it works right and is good in the hands, it could be very nice. I don't know what the camera pretends to be. I know Nikon marketing teased everyone with the "pure photography" sequence, but i don't know what "pure photography" is supposed to be anyway. I guess the romantic notion of wandering around the Scottish countryside in dramatic light with a 50mm lens implies something to someone, but to me it says "cold, probably wet, taking pictures before I freeze to death." G On Nov 5, 2013, at 6:21 AM, Dario Bonazza <[email protected]> wrote: > Am I the only one thinking the Df is way too complicated for being the camera > it pretends to be? > Dario > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Darren Addy <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm sure you saw the accidentally leaked price on Amazon for the DF >> ($2746). I saw the D800 on Overstock.com the other day for $2200. >> >> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Rob Studdert <[email protected]> wrote: >>> It's nice, if it had a K mount or if I was much richer I'd buy one :) >>> >>> On 5 November 2013 13:35, John Celio <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I'm surprised no one has mentioned this here yet: >>>> >>>> http://nikonrumors.com/2013/11/04/this-is-the-nikon-df.aspx/ >>>> >>>> In my opinion, that is a pretty sweet looking camera, especially in >>>> silver. Maybe the rumors of an LX-style Pentax camera aren't too far >>>> off? >>>> >>>> John -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
