I got rid of my printers because I never used them and space is at a premium in a small house like mine. If I need to print text I do it at work. If I wanted to print photos regularly I'd investigate the long-term costs of having to buy ink versus printing at a lab.
B > On 8 Nov 2013, at 01:19, Bruce <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've found that the ink for all printers is pretty cheap as long as you don't > print anything. I didn't see any mention of actually printing, so you > could be pretty safe recommending just about anything. > > -- > Bruce > -- > Sent from Sony Tablet S > > Steve Cottrell <[email protected]> wrote: >> Had a request from the boy. >> >> Verbatim: >> --------------------- >> Your task for the evening (should you choose to accept it (which you >> should(upon death if you dont))): >> need a printer that is semi-good, cheap and reliable and affordable >> ink. >> Preferably comes with scanner. You have 24 hours to comply. >> ---------------------- >> >> Hmm a printer that is 'semi-good' whatever that means. Cheap - well >> plenty of cheap printers about, we all know they make the money on the >> inks. Reliable?? Most printers do a fair job. Affordable ink? Well, not >> the manufacturers ink then. >> >> I use an Epson P50 with Hornsea inks >> >> <http://www.hornseaink.com/> >> >> and touch wood, not had a problem with these inks since started using >> them about a year ago. >> >> Strange, I paid £130 for the P50, now they are retailing for closer to >> £200 ! >> >> Anyway, anyone ? Recommendations based on above please :-) > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
