Thanks for the insight. I might try this and see how lens shift it can compensate for. No macro rail here.
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Bill <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/12/2013 11:36 AM, Zos Xavius wrote: >> >> How precise does the stack have to be in terms of depth? I'm guessing >> you could easily auto-align any other problems. > > > Considering how typically lassez faire I am about technical aspects, I would > say not very precise. All I'm doing is using the focus peaking option of > live view to move the focus point ahead a little bit, making sure that there > is overlap in the peaking and then taking another exposure, and repeating > the process until I have scanned the entire subject. > After that, I let Photoshop do whatever voodoo it is doing to create the > image. > > >> >> On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Bruce Walker <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Beautifully detailed, handsome colours. That knife has a lot of >>> character! > > > Thanks Bruce. I appreciate the comments. > > bill > > > >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Bill <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Another focus stack image. This time shot with the DA100/2.8 macro. >>>> >>>> ISO 100, f/4. 17 x 2 second exposures. >>>> >>>> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/knife2.html > > >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
