On 1/3/2014 9:56 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 3, 2014, at 9:09 AM, CollinB <[email protected]> wrote:
It looks like Ricoh, with its miniscule photography market share, needed
Pentax just as much as Pentax, having little money, needed Ricoh.
It is a mutually beneficial relationship.
I gave strong consideration to leaving Pentax until the K-3 advance came
out.
What I look for in the future is for R-P to do things like update the AF
system
to eliminate or greatly reduce hunting.
That’s largely been accomplished in the K-3, at least in comparison to previous
Pentax offerings. I’ve never shot more than a frame or two with a Nikon or
Canon, so I can’t compare it to the sales leaders. But I’m quite pleased with
the autofocus performance.
Paul
It'll be quite some time before I can make the K-3 plunge, given that I
really will need to invest in a more robust computer to handle the files.
I'm wondering if I'd be better off just getting the improved auto-focus
of a used K-5 II -- even though I would like the extra increased number
of focus-points in the K-3.
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
