"Photographs aren't reality"?

Your going to have to define what you consider reality to be, Marnie.

The subject of a photo is real. (I'm talking about a "traditional" photograph 
taken by a camera/lens onto a light-sensitive surface)

The photo itself is most certainly real. Even if it has been manipulated or 
altered, it most certainly is a real, existing thing.

Perhaps what you meant is that a photo is not always (or even "ever") a 
completely accurate portrayal of the subject? That certainly isn't the same as 
saying "photos aren't reality", because they are. 

It's fidelity to the photographed subject/event that's at issue. 

It's snowing and quite beautiful out. I'm going to go take photos now. They 
will be a representation/portrayal of reality, I assure you.

;-)

Cheers,
frank




[email protected] wrote:
>Of course it is. Photographs aren't reality. 
>
>Cell phones and the fact everyone has cell phones with cameras now, 
>have 
>turned up quite a few police abuses in the news. Bystanders take
>pictures.  
>With so MANY images out there now, a photojournalist is really taking a
>crazy 
> risk altering a picture. 
>
>Photographers know how much "reality" can be  altered just by what they
>
>decide to include in the frame, even without  Photoshopping, but that
>isn't 
>really the issue.
>
>EVERYONE knows about  Photoshopping, we are all subjected to craftily 
>photographed ads all the time.  News agencies SHOULD have different
>standards, if 
>they didn't, propaganda would  be too darn easy.
>
>People need to trust they aren't being DELIBERATELY  lied to. Or forget
>new 
>agencies altogether and just assume/admit they are  propaganda machines
>
>like any other Madison Ave ad company.
>
>Marnie  
>
>In a message dated 1/23/2014 7:49:38 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
>[email protected] writes:
>The problem I see is that there's a basic  assumption that the photons
>entering the lens and recorded on the media  somehow represent THE
>TRUTH. I believe that assumption is flawed.
> 

“Analysis kills spontaneity.” -- Henri-Frederic Amiel



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to