Until I got the LX, the ME S was most used, but then the LX overshadowed it big time. I now find the LX to be too big, too noisy, and too cumbersome for most photography that I do, and the MX gets used more often.
I think that for those who are fortunate enough to have numerous bodies to use (not necessarily own but to use and experiment with), they may find that their most used body changes as more experience with different bodies is garnered and as their photography changes. Those who consistently photograph a particular way or subject, or who have not had the chance to explore the many camera options that are available, may well find that they have a "favorite" or most used body. Sometimes using a different body may contribute to changing one's photographic style or interest. For example, having an LX and certain accessories has made my entry into macro and close-up photography easier. That's not to say the same work couldn't be done with a Spotmatic, but for me the LX has eased the transition into this new area of photography. Bruce Dayton wrote: > An example for me was, when I had PZ-1p's, I liked the MX body more, > but I almost never used it because the PZ-1p was so capable. I guess > this question drives towards what people feel is most applicable to > their needs rather than what feels nice or brings back memories. -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/darkroom-rentals/index.html - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
