He says they're all shot wide open, which would be f/5.6 (f/4 from the 60-250 at full aperture, 1.4x from the TC)
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 08:42:03PM -0400, Kenneth Waller wrote: > > Paul, any idea what the f stops were for those? > > -----Original Message----- > >From: Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> > >Sent: Mar 19, 2014 5:06 PM > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >Subject: Re: Fooling around with the 1.4X converter > > > >Well, I sure screwed that up! > >Here?s the tight crop of Grace: > >http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17712606&size=lg > > > >And here?s the silly sign: > >http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17712603&size=lg > >On Mar 19, 2014, at 4:59 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> The converter arrived today. It?s gray and wet outside and not a bird to > >> be heard, but I shot a few pics to see how well it resolves. All shot wide > >> open with the DA* 60-250/4 at 250mm and converter attached. > >> > >> Here?s an ISO 12,800 indoor pic of Grace, who was home sick and hasn?t > >> washed her hair: > >> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17712604&size=lg > >> > >> Here?s a tight crop of Grace who was home sick and hasn?t washed her hair: > >> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17712604&size=lg > >> > >> Here?s a shot of a silly sign that my neighbor gave me for watering her > >> plants. It?s at a more modest ISO 3200 > >> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17712604&size=lg > >> > >> Very pleased with its performance. Hope to get out to the nature center > >> for some birding next week. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
