The two shots I posted were wide open at 250mm. The EXIF showed 350mm, f5.6.
Paul via phone > On Mar 20, 2014, at 12:58 AM, "Alan C" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Obviously very good optics. So is the EXIF corrected to f5.6? > I'd like to see a shot with the 60-250 at 250mm which would be 350mm at f5.6. > > > Alan C > > -----Original Message----- From: Paul Stenquist > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 4:02 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Fooling around with the 1.4X converter > > Yep, they were all shot wide open, which translates to f5.6. > > >> On Mar 19, 2014, at 9:45 PM, John Francis <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> He says they're all shot wide open, which would be f/5.6 >> (f/4 from the 60-250 at full aperture, 1.4x from the TC) >> >>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 08:42:03PM -0400, Kenneth Waller wrote: >>> >>> Paul, any idea what the f stops were for those? >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Mar 19, 2014 5:06 PM >>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: Fooling around with the 1.4X converter >>>> >>>> Well, I sure screwed that up! >>>> Here?s the tight crop of Grace: >>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17712606&size=lg >>>> >>>> And here?s the silly sign: >>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17712603&size=lg >>>>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 4:59 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The converter arrived today. It?s gray and wet outside and not a bird to >>>>> be heard, but I shot a few pics to see how well it resolves. All shot >>>>> wide open with the DA* 60-250/4 at 250mm and converter attached. >>>>> >>>>> Here?s an ISO 12,800 indoor pic of Grace, who was home sick and hasn?t >>>>> washed her hair: >>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17712604&size=lg >>>>> >>>>> Here?s a tight crop of Grace who was home sick and hasn?t washed her hair: >>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17712604&size=lg >>>>> >>>>> Here?s a shot of a silly sign that my neighbor gave me for watering her >>>>> plants. It?s at a more modest ISO 3200 >>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17712604&size=lg >>>>> >>>>> Very pleased with its performance. Hope to get out to the nature center >>>>> for some birding next week. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > > --- > This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > protection is active. > http://www.avast.com > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
