Replies from two senders interspersed.
On 15/04/2014 6:11 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Tim Bray <[email protected]> wrote:
In the Fuji community, there are certain people who are totally snotty
about the ACR/Lightroom processing of the X-trans raw files and would
only use one of these niche products. I look at their example shots
and can’t see the difference myself....
Yeah, I know. A guy on dpr Fuji forum made a good case for photo ninja,
but when I downloaded it for a trial run, I really didn't see a lot of
difference. The Adobe conversion looked a little softer, but nothing
kicking a slider a bit wouldn't cure.
My main reason for asking was after reading the dpreview of the X-T1
and it mentioned something about the Adobe conversions were better
than supplied software. If such a file will work on LR 4 with my
10.6.8 OS be it readable by LR4 or a DNG converter not regurgitate a
OS upgrade, beauti.
The supplied software is silky pix.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
