On Apr 15, 2014, at 2:52 PM, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 15/04/2014 12:55 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote: >> Ricoh trys to make a big deal that the 645Z sensor is 1.7 times the size >> of a FF >> sensor (24x36) but its not really that much bigger. > It's enough bigger that it seems to make a hell of a difference if what the > original 645 is any indication. If I already owned a bunch of 645 lenses, I > would be all over this camera. >> >> The real significant size jump is from APS-C to FF which is 2.25 times >> bigger sensor. I want a >> FF Pentax K mount DSLR that can use legacy FF K lenses and get that >> 2.25X factor. > > In the real world it's not that big a deal any more, except for the instant > cropping that the smaller format does. > >> I dont want an expensive 645 that can only use limited expensive bulky >> 645 lenses. >> > > Neither do I, but I'm still glad they made it. I want one, I just don’t want one more than I want what $8500 + lenses could get me in terms of a couple of K3s and lenses. > > bill > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
