And yet the K-01 takes some very lovely photos. EVF or no.
[email protected] wrote:
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 19:36:50 -0400
From: "P.J. Alling"<[email protected]>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Trade an *istD for a Samsung NX-30 in NYC
Message-ID:<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 5/28/2014 7:00 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Brian Walters<[email protected]>
wrote:
>>Quoting Bruce Walker<[email protected]>:
>>
>>>Sounds like a truly desperate attempt to get some attention.
>>>
>>>The whole mirrorless thing just isn't getting the traction the manus
>>>hoped for, is it?
>>I wonder why that is. Quite a few on this list have gone down the
>>mirrorless path and I think Ricoh/Pentax is missing out by failing to get a
>>competitive mirrorless camera to market (competitive with the Fuji et al
>>offerings, that is). They've shown they have the technical know-how with
>>the K-01 and Q series.
>Regardless, what is the point of showing off your superior technical
>prowess by creating a camera for a tiny market? Especially if you are
>Pentax and can't afford to (a) dilute your R&D and production
>resources, and (b) spend hard-won money for poor returns. Look what
>happened with the K-01.
>
>
>>I'm fairly sure I've bought my last DSLR (K-5) and I expect to be in the
>>market for something like the Fuji X-E2 about this time next year. If Ricoh
>>can't oblige by then, I'll be changing systems (partly, anyway).
>I went for 6 years between Pentax cameras (K20D -> K-3). There's no
>way I will attempt to predict what Pentax/Ricoh might be offering in
>2020. But given my current direction, my next is likely to be a
>successor to the 645D, which is still an SLR afaik.
>
Let's be honest. The K-01 was a minimal R&D effort. It was basically a
K30 without a Pentaprism/mirrorbos, that sold for about the same price
as a K30. The biggest cost to Pentax was hiring Marc Newsom to put
lipstick on the pig. If Pentax had simply copied the styling cues from a
Kodak Instamatic 100 they would have had a bigger seller, with a higher
profit margin.
If Pentax had actually spent some R&D money on fitting an EVF into it,
at least as good as the one in the Fuji Pro X 1, everyone who owns a
collection of Pentax lenses would have bought one as a second body, to
hell with what it looked like.
-- A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and
the crazy, crazier. - H.L.Mencken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
