Actually it uses the same version of the Prime image processor as the
K-30 produces 12 bit per pixel data files so I expect that it actually
uses the version of the sensor that is in the K-30 which was supposed to
in the same family but not identical to that in the K-5.
On 5/29/2014 6:14 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Don Guthrie <[email protected]>:
And yet the K-01 takes some very lovely photos. EVF or no.
I'm sure it does. It has (I think) the same sensor as the K-5.
I have two problems with the K-01, the first (not surprisingly) being
the lack of a viewfinder - my experience with the Q is that it can be
impossible to compose accurately in strong sunlight and I'd expect the
same problem with the K-01.
My second problem is the decision to adopt the K mount. Apart from
adding to the bulk of the camera, it means that you can't get various
adapters to fit a wide range of older lenses, as you can with other
mirrorless cameras. I would have preferred the designers to have
followed a similar approach to the m43 designers and adopted a short
lens registration distance while allowed the fitting of K-mount lenses
via an AF adapter (assuming that approach would have been technically
feasible).
Cheers
Brian
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
[email protected] wrote:
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 19:36:50 -0400
From: "P.J. Alling"<[email protected]>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Trade an *istD for a Samsung NX-30 in NYC
Message-ID:<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 5/28/2014 7:00 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Brian
Walters<[email protected]> wrote:
Quoting Bruce Walker<[email protected]>:
Sounds like a truly desperate attempt to get some attention.
The whole mirrorless thing just isn't getting the traction the
manus
hoped for, is it?
I wonder why that is. Quite a few on this list have gone down the
mirrorless path and I think Ricoh/Pentax is missing out by
failing to get a
competitive mirrorless camera to market (competitive with the
Fuji et al
offerings, that is). They've shown they have the technical
know-how with
the K-01 and Q series.
Regardless, what is the point of showing off your superior technical
prowess by creating a camera for a tiny market? Especially if you are
Pentax and can't afford to (a) dilute your R&D and production
resources, and (b) spend hard-won money for poor returns. Look what
happened with the K-01.
I'm fairly sure I've bought my last DSLR (K-5) and I expect to
be in the
market for something like the Fuji X-E2 about this time next
year. If Ricoh
can't oblige by then, I'll be changing systems (partly, anyway).
I went for 6 years between Pentax cameras (K20D -> K-3). There's no
way I will attempt to predict what Pentax/Ricoh might be offering in
2020. But given my current direction, my next is likely to be a
successor to the 645D, which is still an SLR afaik.
Let's be honest. The K-01 was a minimal R&D effort. It was
basically a
K30 without a Pentaprism/mirrorbos, that sold for about the same price
as a K30. The biggest cost to Pentax was hiring Marc Newsom to put
lipstick on the pig. If Pentax had simply copied the styling cues
from a
Kodak Instamatic 100 they would have had a bigger seller, with a higher
profit margin.
If Pentax had actually spent some R&D money on fitting an EVF into it,
at least as good as the one in the Fuji Pro X 1, everyone who owns a
collection of Pentax lenses would have bought one as a second body, to
hell with what it looked like.
--
A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy,
crazier.
- H.L.Mencken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
