On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 23, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Bruce Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> She is obviously a very slender woman, and the lighting in that photo 
>>> really accentuates it.  I think that the combination of the cheek and the 
>>> hand shadows, where most people don’t get such hard shadows, makes her look 
>>> as if she has no body fat whatsoever.
>>
>> Yes, applying directional light at that angle really highlights
>> surface contours, and even folks with very little cheekbone definition
>> will get some. Once I placed it, the light stayed put and she was
>> moving around a lot into different poses so the amount and direction
>> of contouring changed significantly from shot to shot. But as a
>> professional she knows just where the light is and avoids poses that
>> would result in dark eye sockets that would have made her look
>> _really_ emaciated, which I appreciated. Directing her was a breeze.
>
> Forgive me if I missed where you described it, but it looks like you have a 
> strip light camera left, almost parallel with her?

Cf: http://pdml.net/pipermail/pdml_pdml.net/2014-June/379573.html

down where it says, Larry: [...]

Strip light yes, but it's about 45 degrees from camera-axis, and
angled down on her about 45 degrees too.

-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to