So you're saying his image must have been run thru PS or some such program ?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Roberts" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...
Ken Waller wrote:
I don't see what's the fuss about the apparent lack of use of PS in the
image.
Um, I think it's the apparent *presence* of PS that's causing fuss.
According to his bio he's been shooting for 30 years so he's likely shot
slide somewhere along the way.
The narrow latitude of slide film is what makes it more likely to need
post-processing. I also have shot slide film for decades: There are
many situations where even perfect exposure yields shadow that needs a
bit of the ol' Curves Tool.
That said, I think the real fuss isn't over the photographer but
rather the pretentious load of bollocks written in by the columnist
who thinks that a piece of unimaginative art selling for a high price
implies that art form is not, in fact, an art at all. That pretty much
dooms painting, sculpture, music and most other art forms in the end.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
