The only requirement for a million dollar photo is a million dollar sucker.
On December 11, 2014 8:15:59 PM PST, Ann Sanfedele <[email protected]> wrote: >Ken - many of yours are much,much better > >That antelope canyon shot is the one I meant - grossly oversaturated on > >my monitor.. if you thought I meant the one with reflections, that's >different - though still not a million dollar shot. > >ann > >On 12/11/2014 21:12, Ken Waller wrote: >> >> Obviously the 6.5 mil is obscene. I'd be proud to call the color >image mine. >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Ann Sanfedele <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ... >>> >>> So I guess the worse photos are the more he gets for them? >>> >>> Toss up which is more awful - the 6.5 or the color Antelope canyon >shot. >>> >>> well after all, this did happen in Las Vegas so... >>> >>> ann >>> >>> On 12/10/2014 16:20, Bruce Walker wrote: >>>> ... and sells a photo for a historical 6.5 million dollars as a >result. >>>> >>>> >https://fstoppers.com/landscapes/what-65-million-dollar-photograph-looks-49113 >> >> >> -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
