Sent from my iPad

> On Feb 7, 2015, at 2:48 PM, steve harley <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 2015-02-07 12:26 , Malcolm Smith wrote:
>> I don't think I've ever had an image printed beyond 16" x 20", so I'm
>> curious how far it can be enlarged and remain really quite sharp, for
>> example as a framed print in a large family room? Larger sensors equal more
>> detail, which you must be able to do more with including fairly big
>> enlargements from a small cropped area of any given image. Are cameras
>> sensors getting too large at 35mm?
> 
> neither larger sensors nor more pixels necessarily equal more detail, but 
> if/when there is more detail, there is still the question of how you would 
> view large prints; i know i usually look at them from farther away than 
> smaller prints, but sometimes i also go really close — i guess if i see very 
> sharp edges no grain on a huge print, i am impressed
> 
> but i still have to step back to really see the whole image, so that detail 
> doesn't change how the image looks, just adds a little "gee whiz" to it; i do 
> feel the flexibility to crop is the biggest benefit of a higher resolution 
> image

Totally agree with Steve's comments. Cheers, Christine 
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to