I think shake reduction with digital is the game changer.  Regards,  Bob S.

On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Malcolm Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> In conversation with a neighbour today whilst I was out with my camera, I
> was asked if a 35mm DSLR produces better images than film does.
>
> I really wasn't sure; the last time this really came up was when the *ist D
> came out, and film was still meant to be far superior, in terms of capturing
> detail and enlargement potential. So what size sensor does 35mm film equate
> to? It appears that ISO 100 was deemed to be about 20MP, but later revised
> to between 4MP-16MP, depending on the film, and 8 MP DSLRs produced an
> 'image quality' close to 16MP. This says more here (last revised 2008):
>
> http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/film.vs.digital.summary1/index.html
>
> A question/answer in a camera magazine today suggested that 24MP 35mm DSLR
> prints could be made to A3 paper size (at 300ppi) and A2 with a 36MP sensor.
>
> This I found shows a 30" x 42" enlargement of a Velvia ISO 50 slide:
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/mikecostolo/3750325141/
>
> I know I've seen similar size enlargements from 35mm DSLRs that look good
> viewed at a close distance from the enlargement.
>
> I also understand the grain difference between film and digital files is
> different, and I'm trying hard not to compare apples with oranges, but with
> 35mm 50.6 MP sensors about to hit the market, have we now reached the point
> where DSLRs conclusively capture more information than film (specifically
> 35mm only)? Additionally, do we have to print at 300ppi? Can you reduce this
> and still produce sharp enough pictures at an enlarged size - assuming the
> image is a good sharp one to begin with?
>
> I don't think I've ever had an image printed beyond 16" x 20", so I'm
> curious how far it can be enlarged and remain really quite sharp, for
> example as a framed print in a large family room? Larger sensors equal more
> detail, which you must be able to do more with including fairly big
> enlargements from a small cropped area of any given image. Are cameras
> sensors getting too large at 35mm?
>
> Malcolm
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to