Thanks, Steve --
Certainly seems so from my PEterson's field guide to western Reptiles,
too (always got to double check Wiki's)
Such a beauty
ann
On 3/8/2015 16:07, steve harley wrote:
On 2015-03-08 13:27 , Larry Colen wrote:
I'll admit, that I had noticed a little noise in the background, but
with my
K20, any shot of the sky would show worse noise at ISO 800, possibly 400.
Welcome to the twenty first century where an ISO 10,000 photo might
look "a
little rough in the shadows".
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/16565623039/in/set-72157651226463471
yeah, a dramatic image, and your tale encourages me to use higher ISO more
this is a case where that little bit of noise actually makes a nice
contrast with the foreground subject, makes it look less sterile than it
might with a "clean" background; i think i see some sharpening and
suspect some noise reduction may have occurred (perhaps automatically);
i wonder whether this image was particularly well suited to the
mechanics of those effects
i'm no herpetologist, but i'm going to guess ring-necked snake
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diadophis_punctatus>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
