Thanks, Mark—those links were really helpful.  Given the importance of live 
view when shooting with a DSLR, converting my k7 seems like a better 
option—especially if working in urban areas.  The k-5 is my back-up to the k-3, 
so I wouldn’t use it, but the k-7 I could and the extra advantage would be it 
is much smaller and lighter than my K10 and k20.  

Cheers, Christine


> On May 16, 2015, at 5:51 PM, Mark C <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I really liked the IR converted K10D but I'm seeing some interesting things 
> with this converted compact camera. With the K10D exposure was always a crap 
> shoot - which is what you'd expect since the meter is still based on visible 
> light, not IR. The exposure discrepancies were not trivial - often more than 
> the +/- 3 stops that could be covered with the exposure compensation mode. So 
> - that makes it hard to capture the decisive moment with street photography, 
> and a that is one frustration I had with the camera.
> 
> With the compact camera the metering  is off the sensor and it is as 
> consistent as you'd expect with a visible light camera. I believe that a DSLR 
> with live view would do the same, or of course the K-01.
> 
> Using this compact makes me realize that the ideal IR camera would be a 
> larger sensor mirrorless with EVF.
> 
> I may  convert either my K01 or K5 to IR, but can't decide which. I would 
> probably use the K5 and work with live view whenever possible, and then fall 
> back to using the view finder if needed. Could probably lock exposure with 
> live view and then compose using the finder.
> 
> This page compares the pros and cons of different camera converted to IR (the 
> chart at the bottom is very good):
> 
> http://www.kolarivision.com/PSvMirrorlessvDSLR.html
> 
> And there is a ton of stuff here:
> 
> http://www.lifepixel.com/
> 
> I am going to assess the results I get with the P6000. With IR a normal zoom 
> seems to generally cover things, and the P6000 is very good in terms of image 
> quality. It gets noisy at higher ISO settings but I notice that most of what 
> I shot yesterday in auto ISO mode was at ISO 64 - even in cloudy scenes - so 
> it seems to have good sensitivity to IR light. While the camera is slow and 
> full of poorly implemented features the basic image quality is pretty good. 
> If I do decide to convert another DSLR, like I said it will probably be 
> something with live view, like the K5.
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/16/2015 4:09 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
>> Yep I'm thinking of doing it as well. I have a k-10 I could use. Any 
>> thoughts Mark?
>> 
>> Cheers, Christine
>> 
>> Christine Aguila, Asst. Professor
>> Communications Dept.
>> Truman College
>> FC4 President
>> 
>>> On May 16, 2015, at 2:32 PM, Christine Nielsen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm intrigued by the IR conversion, too... I have an *ist-d or a k-7 I'd 
>>> consider converting... Any thoughts on which is the better candidate?
>>> 
>>> -c
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On May 16, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Christine Aguila <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the link, Mark!  I just may convert my k-10D.  This idea gets a 
>>> serious think.  He seems like a nice guy.  Read is bio etc.
>>> 
>>> Might be fun to do Urban IR.
>>> 
>>> And nice test shots by the way!
>>> 
>>> Cheers, Christine
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On May 15, 2015, at 10:56 PM, Mark C <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> With my IR converted K10D only working with manual lenses, I decided to 
>>>> convert another camera for IR use. Sent my old Nikon P6000 in for the 
>>>> process. While this is a very flawed camera in terms of poorly implemented 
>>>> features, it takes good photos and produces a pretty robust 13.5 MP file. 
>>>> The camera arrived this morning, just as my wife an I were heading out to 
>>>> for our semi annual visit to the town where I grew up, with the purpose of 
>>>> dropping a couple flower pots on my parents' graves. So here are some test 
>>>> shots with the newly converted camera - no interesting compositions but 
>>>> just tests of the cameras abilities:
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/testing-ir-converted-nikon-p6000?blog=9
>>>> 
>>>> Those iamges went through the same basic process  - a little boost to 
>>>> contrast,  clarity, and saturation in ACR. One in Photoshop I ran macros 
>>>> to switch the red and blue channels in PS and apply the PS lens correction 
>>>> filter to remove the distortion. then just a quick adjustment to level the 
>>>> horizon and crop if needed. For virtually automated processing - the 
>>>> results were great. I am surprised at how well the camera meters - very 
>>>> accurate  where with the K10d I had to do a bit of adjustment with each 
>>>> shot.
>>>> 
>>>> The conversion cost $150 and was done here:
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.isaacszabo.com/infrared.html
>>>> 
>>>> The K-01 would cost the same to convert but a Pentax DSLR would be $200. I 
>>>> am toying with the idea of sending in either my K-01 or K-5, but will want 
>>>> to fully test out the Nikon Compact (its a lot easier to carry...)
>>>> 
>>>> Mark
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---
>>>> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
>>>> protection is active.
>>>> http://www.avast.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>> follow the directions.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to