Indeed, it's the intent that's the key, I shoot these days to give me the best image to post process.
On 3 November 2015 at 00:41, John <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess a more accurate explanation of my intent is to get as much of > the image as possible right in the camera to make my post processing > workflow easier. > > I want to "finish it in Photoshop", rather than having to "fix it". > > > On 11/2/2015 7:15 AM, Rob Studdert wrote: >> >> Sorry late to the thread as I only pop my head in occasionally these >> days. The get it right in camera concept was born from the fact that >> you had to, there was little potential to manage issues like you would >> with a ND grad after the shot. >> >> The PP workflow is now part of the image making process for any >> photographer that wishes to maximise their image output quality and I >> don't see it as cheating or otherwise it has just brought the >> management of some image capture issue to another place or via other >> means that provides far greater freedom and accuracy. >> >> Synthesizing ND's using in camera or PP multiple image averaging >> negates colour shifts, focus and composition difficulties, additional >> kit, additional cost and potential image degradation due to extra >> glass in the optical path. The bottom line is that for stills I just >> can't see a good reason to waste good cash on any type of ND filters >> these days. >> >> On 24 October 2015 at 07:20, John <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/22/2015 1:23 PM, Collin B wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.provideocoalition.com/3x-nd-the-sharpest-and-most-neutral-nd-filt >>>> er >>>> >>>> Makes me wonder -- how many tolerate errors on the digital image knowing >>>> they can probably be corrected in PS and how many want to get it right >>>> at >>>> the shot? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> It depends. I generally prefer to get it right in the camera, but I'm >>> thankful Photoshop exists for when I don't get what I want. >>> >>> Plus, my K20D developed a clump of about 50 dead pixels in one spot and >>> was not "economically" repairable. I could use the spot healing brush in >>> Camera Raw to repair that spot. >>> > > > -- > Science - Questions we may never find answers for. > Religion - Answers we must never question. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
