Me too. Cheers,
frank the confused On December 13, 2015 12:22:13 PM EST, Jack Davis <[email protected]> wrote: >I'm anxious to read your responses, Frank. > >J > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "knarf" <[email protected]> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 8:35:25 AM >Subject: Re: PESO - Old Skool > >I used to have the hood! > >It friction - fit on the filter ring and was secured by a small knurled >screw. Not the most secure system, I lost the hood one day in a crowd. > >Yesterday's foray with the lens was a huge disappointment. It kept >focusing several feet behind the subject. I don't know how that could >happen as I have no problem focusing with my M 200mm and Tamron 90mm >macro, both of which I use often. If it's focused on the focusing >screen why wouldn't it actually be in focus? If the focusing screen is >somehow askew shouldn't all my manual focus lenses suffer similarly? > >I don't get it... > >Cheers, > >frank > >On December 12, 2015 6:37:10 PM EST, "P.J. Alling" ><[email protected]> wrote: >>One other note, the most useful accessory for this lens is the hood >>originally meant for the S1 90-180mm Flat Field Zoom. >> >>On 12/12/2015 12:51 PM, knarf wrote: >>> Going for image quality over speed and stealth today: >>> >>> http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2015/12/old-skool.html?m=1 >>> >>> Could be thought of as OT because it wasn't taken with a Pentax >>product but obviously Pentax content, so I'm opting for "not OT". >>> >>> That is one unbelievably heavy lens. I guess a real and actual metal >>barrel will do that. >>> >>> Enjoy! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
