El Viernes 19 de febrero de 2016 7:14, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> escribió:
Why? Because you believe that "mirrorless cameras can only be dinky little things"?? That's ridiculous, PJ. G > On Feb 18, 2016, at 9:46 PM, P.J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, the Leica SL is huge for a mirrorless camera, even a FF mirroless, like > the Sony A7II. It's all relative really. Hi, I don't think that it is ridiculous at all. On of the main selling point of mirrorless is to get the same image quality with less size/weight. That's why their users are (in general) more sensitive to these factors. Of course YMMV, and you probably value factors other than size/weigh, but I am with PJ in that mirrorless are supposed to be smaller/lighter, and Sony has marked a high standard with their A7 family. Regards, Jaume -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
