I agree, that if adding software is a problem, since iTunes is
preinstalled on Macs, it might be an easier solution.
"Efficient"? -- That's a matter of preference. I don't like iTunes UI
(circa ~2012-2013), and found it somewhat confusing and non-ergonomic.
And I am not the only one.
(This is on Windows, I haven't used it on Mac).
And I don't remember details, but I remember that either ripping a CD into
mp3 or converting from its own acc to mp3 was very cumbersome if at all
possible around ~ 2011-2012.
"Higher quality"? -- Is that statement based on facts or just because?
Audacity is _very_ capable, high quality software designed for sound
recording and editing. (And it has almost as long history as
iTunes/SoundJam MP.) If you are unfamiliar with it, look it up!
While iTune might excel in AAC format, it is a media _management_
software. I don't know how it works now, but until at least
2012, iTunes was even struggling with adding some MP3s to its library.
(Just google for “can't add music to iTunes” problem).
So, knowing your technical background and attention to detail, I am
very surprised by such a frivolous (if not wrong) statement.
Igor
Godfrey DiGiorgi Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:04:27 -0800 wrote:
It's completely irrelevant since iTunes will do the conversion properly,
quickly, and without adding more software. There really is no more
efficient or
higher quality way to do this.
G
On Feb 25, 2016, at 5:38 PM, Igor PDML-StR <[email protected]> wrote:
Audacity on Windows allows to create a "chain", - essentially a script
of actions, and then to apply to a set of files. So, it is a "batch"
conversion. ...
…
I don't know how it works on a Mac, I suspect it is probably the same.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
