Well, not necessarily. DOF also depends on COC (circle of confusion), which is inverse proportional to resolution. Hence, together with future higher resolution, we will see today's amazing DOF dropping towards... 35mm standards.
It amazes me how many see film and digital as comparable - maybe because people look at proofs of the same size. Still, let's not forget film can be enlarged an order of magnitude further, so the DOF is the price we pay for more detail, bigger enlargements. Servus, Alin (who also prefers good bokeh to high DOF) Paul wrote: vvn> Well, I remind you what someone pointed out this week: With a vvn> typical small CCD, f/2.8 yields the same depth of field as a 35mm vvn> camera's f/11. That's why the pictures taken by my friends' vvn> digicams often put mine to shame. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
