Rob, By the same token, because one has spent tons of cash for 55mm 67 lens, there's no reason to make 35mm cameras where 50/2 often comes for free ;) Besides, the 35mm equivalent of 67 55mm lens is what, roughly 24mm? There are tons of those available for fraction of what one has to spend for a MF lens. To the point: if there'll be small and light and fast and inexpensive wide angle glass for the new format, hell, I wouldn't mind spending a hundred bucks for a top-notch equivalent of 35mm 20/2 that's half the size and weight. In any event, all this is nothing but speculation. Let's see what really comes up.
Mishka --- Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unless of course you've already spent a sh*t load of cash on wide > Pentax K mount glass due to the promise of a Pentax K mount 135 full > frame > digital body? > :-( > > Rob Studdert Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
