On 6/16/2016 11:09 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Dan, I would call that photo "relics" or "defuncts", depending on the mood. :-) John, As for that new machine, - I'd say, it's some 20-years too late. It could've been a big hit in 1996 (assuming it would had been working well). Igor
Wouldn't work for everyone. I still enjoy using film, but I no longer have any reasonably convenient way to process it. I've got no room for a darkroom. A daylight machine that cost less than a new camera body, handles multiple processes & can be used without a dedicated darkroom would appeal to me. I don't think I'm the only photographer who enjoyed the process of turning film into images. Bet it would be a BIG HIT with hipsters. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
